Google has escaped a fine for collecting personal data – including email addresses and passwords – being used in UK public Wi-Fi spots. But has Google really escaped lightly? According to Jack Adams, search engine optimisation (SEO) consultant at leading search specialist marketing and technology firm Greenlight, whilst this won’t have an impact for search engine marketing, the damage to Google’s brand perception is substantial and perhaps a time for Bing to make a focussed marketing push.
Despite labelling the act as a “significant breach” of the Data Protection Act that was “not fair or lawful,” the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), has simply requested that Google delete the offending data and given the search giant nine months to review its privacy practices.
The general consensus is that the ICO has been very lenient over this – its probe has been labelled “lily-livered” by Tory Member of Parliament (MP) Robert Halfon.
In direct monetary terms it seems certainly Google has got off lightly (in the UK at least – investigations in other nations are ongoing). However, there can’t be any denying that some extent of damage has been done to users’ confidence in the brand and its squeaky-clean image, built around the company’s “don’t be evil” motto.
Indeed, as much has been admitted by Amy Whitten, Google’s new Director of Privacy for the Engineering and Product divisions. “We’re very aware that our business is based on the trust of users and if damaged [then] that’s the worst thing we could do.”
This damage has been compounded by the widespread national news coverage of the privacy breaches, especially with the matter being discussed in UK parliament. Even in general conversations, one slightly less-than-tech-savvy individual expressed reservations over Google, asking whether this breach means they should discontinue internet banking in fear of online fraud, demonstrating just how this news has pervaded the general public. The question though is whether this has put the respective individual off searching with Google? Will they now switch to a competitor – Bing, perhaps?
The damage to Google’s brand perception is substantial, but the impact of this for search engine marketing is likely not – with Google near monopolising UK search (93% market share at present, according to StatCounter) and “to google” being a verb officially listed in the Oxford English Dictionary since 2006, the awareness of competitors seems too low for many of Google’s users to really take action against the search giant. Despite Bing’s above the line marketing push, many still aren’t aware of the service.
Given this, the UK’s traditional focus on Google for search engine marketing looks set to continue for the meantime. However, with this story looking likely to remain in the news for the near future – with further developments into this investigation, forthcoming worldwide sanctions against Google and MPs seeking to leverage to public’s concern for political gain – an astutely timed and focused marketing push from Bing could still have an impact on the search landscape in the UK.
By Jack Adams
SEO Consultant
Greenlight
About the author
Jack Adams is an SEO consultant at Greenlight where he works primarily on accounts such as Legal & General, Co-operative Financial Services and CMC Markets, providing both strategic and technical SEO consultation. Prior to Greenlight, Jack developed and marketed a number of successful websites and personal projects.
http://www.greenlightsearch.com
One Comment
Comments are closed.
Hi, one of my friend explain about Google’s Street By his explanation i think that it is good one.Thanks for sharing this good information..:)